Staff View: Comparison of Synthesis Techniques for Supported Iron Nanocatalysts

Comparison of Synthesis Techniques for Supported Iron Nanocatalysts

Iron-based catalyst is the most common catalyst for Fischer-Tropsch Synthesis (FTS), which is a process to synthesize transportation fuel and chemicals feedstock from the syngas. The effect of synthesis technique, iron loading and catalyst supports on the physicochemical properties of iron-based cat...

Full description

Main Authors:	Tasfy, S. H., Mohd Zabidi, N. A., Subbarao, D
Format:	Citation Index Journal
Institution:	Universiti Teknologi Petronas
Record Id / ISBN-0:	utp-eprints.4718 /
Published:	Asian Network for Scientific Information 2011
Subjects:	QD Chemistry
Online Access:	http://eprints.utp.edu.my/4718/1/Comparison_of_Synthesis_Techniques_for_Supported_Iron_Nanocatalysts.pdf http://eprints.utp.edu.my/4718/
Tags:	Add Tag No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

id	utp-eprints.4718
recordtype	eprints
spelling	utp-eprints.47182017-03-20T01:59:46Z Comparison of Synthesis Techniques for Supported Iron Nanocatalysts Tasfy, S. H. Mohd Zabidi, N. A. Subbarao, D QD Chemistry Iron-based catalyst is the most common catalyst for Fischer-Tropsch Synthesis (FTS), which is a process to synthesize transportation fuel and chemicals feedstock from the syngas. The effect of synthesis technique, iron loading and catalyst supports on the physicochemical properties of iron-based catalyst was investigated. Impregnation and precipitation methods were used to synthesize the supported iron-based nanocatalysts containing various iron loadings. Silica and alumina silica were used as catalyst supports to modify the catalyst properties in producing well defined phases. The supported iron nanocatalysts were characterized using N2 physical adsorption, field emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM), transmission electron microscopy (TEM), and temperature-programmed reduction (TPR). For the catalysts prepared via impregnation method, the surface area remained at 23m2/g for catalyst containing different iron loading. However, for those prepared via the precipitation method, the surface area of the catalyst increased with increasing iron loading. Precipitation method resulted in highly agglomerated iron nanoparticles. The 6% Fe/SiO2 nanocatalyst prepared via impregnation method resulted in relatively small and uniform dispersion of iron nanoparticles. However, bimodal distribution was observed for the 10 and 15% Fe/SiO2. Similar trend was observed when Al2O3-SiO2 was used as a catalyst support. H2-TPR profiles for Fe/SiO2 nanocatalysts synthesized via impregnation showed two reduction stages while those prepared using precipitation method resulted in three reduction peaks. The TPR peak positions remained the same for various iron loadings. Asian Network for Scientific Information 2011 Citation Index Journal PeerReviewed application/pdf http://eprints.utp.edu.my/4718/1/Comparison_of_Synthesis_Techniques_for_Supported_Iron_Nanocatalysts.pdf Tasfy, S. H. and Mohd Zabidi, N. A. and Subbarao, D (2011) Comparison of Synthesis Techniques for Supported Iron Nanocatalysts. [Citation Index Journal] http://eprints.utp.edu.my/4718/
institution	Universiti Teknologi Petronas
collection	UTP Institutional Repository
topic	QD Chemistry
spellingShingle	QD Chemistry Tasfy, S. H. Mohd Zabidi, N. A. Subbarao, D Comparison of Synthesis Techniques for Supported Iron Nanocatalysts
description	Iron-based catalyst is the most common catalyst for Fischer-Tropsch Synthesis (FTS), which is a process to synthesize transportation fuel and chemicals feedstock from the syngas. The effect of synthesis technique, iron loading and catalyst supports on the physicochemical properties of iron-based catalyst was investigated. Impregnation and precipitation methods were used to synthesize the supported iron-based nanocatalysts containing various iron loadings. Silica and alumina silica were used as catalyst supports to modify the catalyst properties in producing well defined phases. The supported iron nanocatalysts were characterized using N2 physical adsorption, field emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM), transmission electron microscopy (TEM), and temperature-programmed reduction (TPR). For the catalysts prepared via impregnation method, the surface area remained at 23m2/g for catalyst containing different iron loading. However, for those prepared via the precipitation method, the surface area of the catalyst increased with increasing iron loading. Precipitation method resulted in highly agglomerated iron nanoparticles. The 6% Fe/SiO2 nanocatalyst prepared via impregnation method resulted in relatively small and uniform dispersion of iron nanoparticles. However, bimodal distribution was observed for the 10 and 15% Fe/SiO2. Similar trend was observed when Al2O3-SiO2 was used as a catalyst support. H2-TPR profiles for Fe/SiO2 nanocatalysts synthesized via impregnation showed two reduction stages while those prepared using precipitation method resulted in three reduction peaks. The TPR peak positions remained the same for various iron loadings.
format	Citation Index Journal
author	Tasfy, S. H. Mohd Zabidi, N. A. Subbarao, D
author_sort	Tasfy, S. H.
title	Comparison of Synthesis Techniques for Supported Iron Nanocatalysts
title_short	Comparison of Synthesis Techniques for Supported Iron Nanocatalysts
title_full	Comparison of Synthesis Techniques for Supported Iron Nanocatalysts
title_fullStr	Comparison of Synthesis Techniques for Supported Iron Nanocatalysts
title_full_unstemmed	Comparison of Synthesis Techniques for Supported Iron Nanocatalysts
title_sort	comparison of synthesis techniques for supported iron nanocatalysts
publisher	Asian Network for Scientific Information
publishDate	2011
url	http://eprints.utp.edu.my/4718/1/Comparison_of_Synthesis_Techniques_for_Supported_Iron_Nanocatalysts.pdf http://eprints.utp.edu.my/4718/
_version_	1741196076398936064
score	11.62408

Comparison of Synthesis Techniques for Supported Iron Nanocatalysts

Similar Items